C Sharp/Inheritance
< C Sharp
继承的要点:
- 派生类包含了被继承类的成员和数据
- 构造函数和析构函数不能被继承
- 派生类的成员的可访问性依赖于在被继承类的成员的可访问性
- 派生类成员可覆盖被继承类成员
using System;
using System.Text;
namespace ContainmentInheritance
{
class Room
{
public int length;
public int width;
public int height;
public Room(int l, int w, int h)
{
length = l;
width = w;
height = h;
}
}
class Home
{
int numberOfRooms;
int plotSize;
string locality;
string name;
// create an object of class Room inside class Home
Room studyRoom = new Room(10, 12, 12);
public Home()
{
numberOfRooms = 1;
plotSize = 1000;
locality = "Versova";
name = "study room";
}
public void Display()
{
Console.WriteLine("MyHome has {0} rooms", numberOfRooms);
Console.WriteLine("Plot size is {0}", plotSize);
Console.WriteLine("Locality is {0}", locality);
int area = studyRoom.length*studyRoom.width;
Console.WriteLine("Area of the {0} room is {1}", name, area);
}
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Home myhome = new Home();
myhome.Display();
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
}
虚方法
编辑public class Resource : IDisposable
{
private bool _isClosed = false; // good programming practice initialise, although default
protected virtual void Close()
{
Console.WriteLine("Base resource closer called!");
}
~Resource()
{
Dispose();
}
public void Dispose()
{
if (!_isClosed)
{
Console.WriteLine("Disposing resource and calling the Close() method...");
_isClosed = true;
Close();
}
}
}
public class AnotherTypeOfResource : Resource
{
protected override void Close()
{
Console.WriteLine("Another type of resource closer called!");
}
}
public class VirtualMethodDemo
{
public static void Main()
{
Resource res = new Resource();
AnotherTypeOfResource res2 = new AnotherTypeOfResource();
res.Dispose(); // Resource.Close() will be called.
res2.Dispose(); // Even though Dispose() is part of the Resource class,
// the Resource class will call AnotherTypeOfResource.Close()!
}
}
继承关键字
编辑C#的继承使用:
运算符。
public class Executive : Employee
虚方法使用关键字virtual.
public virtual void Write(string text)
{
System.Console.WriteLine("Text:{0}", text);
}
覆盖基类的虚方法使用关键字 override
keyword:
public override void Write(string text)
{
System.Console.WriteLine(text);
}
派生类的同名方法如果不使用new
或 override
关键字声明则会被编译警告:[1]
abstract class ShapesA
{
abstract public int Area(); // abstract!
}
class Square : ShapesA
{
int x, y;
public int Area() // Error: missing 'override' or 'new'
{
return x * y;
}
}
class Shapes
{
virtual public int Area() { return 0; } // it is virtual now!
}
class Square : Shapes
{
int x, y;
public int Area() // no explicit 'override' or 'new' required
{ return x * y; }
}
参考文献
编辑- ↑ Greg Beech(2010年3月9日).C# design: Why is new/override required on abstract methods but not on virtual methods? / Answer.eFreedom.于2011年8月11日查阅.原文:“Using either the C# 3.0 compiler as shipped in .NET 3.5 SP1, or the C# 4.0 compiler as shipped in .NET 4.0, I get the following error for your first example: [...] And the following warning for the second one: [...] In the first case it's an error because you aren't actually overriding the base method, which means there is no implementation for the abstract method in a concrete class. In the second case it's a warning because the code is technically correct, but the compiler suspects that it isn't what you meant. This is one of the reasons it's generally a good idea to enable the "treat warnings as errors" compilation setting.”